Nigerian streamer and entertainer Carter Efe has sparked controversy after issuing a fresh threat against social media activist VeryDarkMan (VDM), giving him just two hours to prepare petitions against him across all 36 states of Nigeria.
The streamer made the remarks in a video where he repeatedly cursed VeryDarkMan and extended his verbal attacks to the activist’s mother, including disturbing statements involving death and sexual violence.
According to Daily Post Nigeria’s report on Carter Efe’s confrontation with VeryDarkMan, the streamer challenged the activist to use petitions against him, dismissing the potential consequences in aggressive language.
READ ALSO: Chris Pappas Makes History: First Openly Gay Man Elected to the US Senate
1. Carter Efe Gives VeryDarkMan Two Hours
Carter Efe directly challenged VeryDarkMan to prepare petitions against him across Nigeria’s 36 states within two hours.
He reportedly said:
“I give you two hours, write every petition for the full 36 states. If I no use your petition paper do suya, call me bastard.”
The statement appeared to mock the activist’s approach of filing petitions and complaints against public figures.
2. Streamer Threatens VDM’s Mother
The controversy escalated when Carter Efe brought VeryDarkMan’s mother into the disagreement.
In the video, the streamer said:
“VeryDarkMan, if you no bring me down, your mama go die. Anything wey your mama dey find for this life, e no go see am. I swear to God who made me.”
The remarks included a death wish directed at the activist’s mother, drawing attention to the increasingly personal nature of the confrontation.
3. Carter Efe Makes Disturbing Sexual Threat
Another portion of the video contained an explicit threat involving VeryDarkMan’s mother.
Carter Efe reportedly said:
“If care is not taken, them go send boys make them go fu*k your mama.”
The statement has intensified concerns about the language being used in online celebrity disagreements, particularly when threats extend to family members who are not directly involved.
4. The Outburst Adds to Carter Efe and VDM’s Tension
The latest confrontation is another development in the increasingly heated exchanges involving Carter Efe and VeryDarkMan.
The activist is known for publicly criticising celebrities, entertainers and influential personalities, while Carter Efe has frequently defended people he considers friends or supporters.
The two personalities have become involved in public disagreements, with their exchanges attracting attention from followers across social media platforms.
5. Davido and Zlatan Feature in the Wider Dispute
Reports surrounding Carter Efe’s recent outbursts indicate that his disagreement with VeryDarkMan is connected to the activist’s criticism of Davido and Zlatan Ibile.
Carter Efe has reportedly expressed anger over what he considers attacks on people who have supported him.
However, the immediate trigger for the two-hour petition challenge was not independently established in the video report.
6. Threats Against Family Members Raise Concerns
The involvement of VeryDarkMan’s mother has become a major point of concern in the controversy.
Criticism of public figures is common in Nigeria’s entertainment industry, but threatening relatives moves the disagreement beyond ordinary online insults.
The remarks also raise questions about the responsibility of influential online personalities when addressing disagreements in public.
7. What Happens Next?
At the time of the report, the immediate consequences of Carter Efe’s challenge remained unclear.
The streamer’s two-hour deadline was presented as a dare rather than a formal legal notice.
Whether VeryDarkMan would respond through petitions, public statements or another approach was not established in the report.
Conclusion
Carter Efe’s latest confrontation with VeryDarkMan has drawn attention because of its aggressive language, the two-hour petition challenge and the threats involving the activist’s mother.
The episode highlights how disagreements between Nigerian internet personalities can escalate rapidly when personal insults and threats become part of public exchanges.
Ultimately, the controversy places renewed attention on the boundaries between online criticism, personal attacks and threats against individuals and their families.
